Rose Legal Costing Introduces Deferred Fees for Costs Assessments – Empowering Clients to Maximise Recovery As New South Wales and Victoria’s premier legal costs consultants, Rose Legal is proud to unveil our innovative deferred fee option for cost assessments. This approach allows clients to pursue recovery through a costs assessment without the immediate financial burden […]
Understanding Legal Costs in the Federal Court: A Rose Legal Insight As leading legal costs consultants in Sydney and Melbourne, we at Rose Legal understand the complexities surrounding legal costs, particularly in Federal Court proceedings. Whether you’re a solicitor or a client facing potential legal fees, grasping the intricacies of a taxation in the Federal
Understanding Legal Costs in the Federal Court: A Rose Legal Insight Read More »
By Kieran Pulley The Importance of Costs Agreements in Evidencing a Client’s Liability for CostsIn the complex world of legal costs, understanding the nuances of a client’s liability is crucial for both legal practitioners and their clients. This insight, prepared by Kieran Pulley, Legal Costs Consultant at Rose Legal, delves into a recent case that highlights
The Importance of Costs Agreements in Evidencing a Client’s Liability for Costs Read More »
By Darius Self Navigating Complex Legal Cost Assessments – Insights from the Gregg v PwC Case[2024] NSWCA 111 (10 May 2024) In the ever-evolving landscape of legal costs, understanding the intricacies of cost assessments is crucial for both legal professionals and their clients. This insight, prepared by Darius Self, Legal Costs Consultant at Rose Legal, delves
Understanding the intricacies of costs assessments Read More »
By Kieran Pulley Wilson v Mirus Australia Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 111 (10 May 2024) This judgment, handed down on 10 May 2024, concerned an application brought by Simon Wilson (Mr Wilson) seeking leave to appeal the decision of Campbell J made in Mirus Australia Pty Ltd v Wilson [2023] NSWSC 1432 (Supreme Court proceeding) where
Rule 21.10 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) sets out the basic position as to how costs are to be dealt with: “Unless the Court otherwise orders, a party entitled to costs in a proceeding (other than a proceeding to which the Bankruptcy Act applies) is entitled to:
A look at legal costs in the Federal Court Read More »
Rule 21.10 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) sets out the basic position as to how costs are to be dealt with: “Unless the Court otherwise orders, a party entitled to costs in a proceeding (other than a proceeding to which the Bankruptcy Act applies) is entitled to: costs in accordance with Parts 1
Legal Costs in the Federal Court: taxation, lump sum costs and independent referees Read More »
By Katie O’Brien: Mirus Australia Pty Ltd v Wilson [2023] NSWSC 1432 (24 November 2023) On the instruction of Kennedys, Rose Legal Costing prepared a review application on behalf of Mirus Australia Pty Ltd (Mirus), the paying party in an ordered costs assessment. The result of this was that the original determination was reduced by
Rose Legal Costing were recently instructed on behalf of a law firm seeking to recover their costs from a client that had gone elsewhere and had refused to pay costs to the law firm. By the time of the assessment, the substantive case had reached a successful outcome. One of the submissions put forward by
Case Study: What you can do if a client is refusing to pay costs Read More »
Shaw v Niru Construction Pty Ltd & Anor (No.3) [2021] NSWDC 624 The phrase “rule of thumb” is derived from an old English law that stated that you couldn’t beat your wife with anything wider than your thumb. This is, thankfully (according to Wikipedia, which no lawyer worth their salt would ever refer to) just
Multiple defendants and the rule of thumb (The Currabubula Principle) Read More »
Please call or send a private message.
The first consultation is free.
We look forward to hearing from you!
